centrichaa.blogg.se

Arturia analog lab 3 vs ik multimedia syntronik
Arturia analog lab 3 vs ik multimedia syntronik










To Leo, I'd simply use Diva, and render where possible. The 1.1 version is about 40% better on CPU than the 1.0 version. Yeah, I was going to send Leo the SOS review today, as well. I might be wrong about that.Īnyway, good luck and have fun. I thought U-he had a demo - I believe you can install it and it will make a distorted noise every once in a while until you actually pay for it and put in a serial number. They are both currently in my top 5 softsynths, and should be on any serious softsynth user's short list to seriously consider. For me, Diva has become my go-to VA synth, and I use it more than Serum. They both are class-leading and sound great in their respective areas of expertise, and honestly compliment each other like I mentioned previously. Everything is personal preference of course. Re: sound quality - the sound quality of one is not "better" than the other. When Diva came out, it gained a reputation that it used a lot of CPU (rightfully so), but any current computer should be able to handle it just fine, and again, you have different accuracy modes, etc.

arturia analog lab 3 vs ik multimedia syntronik arturia analog lab 3 vs ik multimedia syntronik

You can set it to draft, fast, great, and divine accuracy modes with a corresponding increase in CPU usage. The CPU load is relative to the patches and what mode (aka "accuracy") the plugin is in. They're both fantastic plugins, totally co-exist just fine, and they compliment each other beautifully.












Arturia analog lab 3 vs ik multimedia syntronik